Saturday, 12.1.2008: Income from Angkor Wat Is More Than $60 Million, but the State Gets Less Than $10 Million

Posted on 13 January 2008. Filed under: Week 542 |

The Mirror, Vol. 12, No. 542

“Parliamentarian Son Chhay wrote a letter to Prime Minister Mr. Hun Sen, asking him to reconsider the rights granted the Sokimex company to administer Angkor Wat. In a letter to Prime Minister Mr. Hun Sen on 10 January 2008, Mr. Son Chhay pointed out that the rights granted to Oknha Sok Kong’s company to administer Angkor Wat makes the state lose not less than $50 million each year.

“In 2007 alone, the income from tourists visiting Angkor Wat was approximately US$50 million, but the government gave a contract to Oknha Sok Kong’s company to manage Angkor Wat, through which the state gets every year only US$10 million from the company. As a consequence, Angkor Wat, which is the most important Khmer heritage, easily benefits Sok Kong’s company not less than $50 million each year. Therefore, Mr. Son Chhay asked the government, especially Prime Minister Mr. Hun Sen, to reconsider the contract given to the Sokimex Company to administer Angkor Wat; otherwise, the government will continue to lose benefits while the company does not do anything to protect or maintain Angkor Wat. This means that the Sokimex Company of Oknha Sok Kong can sleep and still wait to easily receive benefits from the historical heritage of all Khmers.

“Mr. Son Chhay affirmed that this is an issue the government must reconsider, relating to the granting of rights, and in future there should be bids announced appropriately, not again to be conducted quietly, giving the right to Sok Kong’s company like it happened. At present, it is affirmed that the number of tourists increased in 2007; the number of foreign tourists that visited Cambodian was more than two million. According to officials of the Ministry of Tourism, it is expected that in 2008 the number of tourists will continue to increase. Though the number of tourists increases, the government does not update the contract with the Sokimex company to increase the amount of money to be paid to the government. The amount continues to be maintained at $10 million per year.

“Mr. Son Chhay said that there is nothing to be seen which was developed and paid for by the Sokimex company; that means that the company just waits to get benefits easily. He said that even the toilets for tourists are not good, which is a shame for the nation. Nonetheless, the government seems not to think about what Mr. Son Chhay has raised. According to reports, the government still continues to grant the right to Sok Kong’s company to manage Angkor Wat and to collect money from all tourists.

“The Ministry of Tourism boasted about the increase in the number of tourists visiting Cambodia, especially coming to visit Angkor Wat, and that in 2007, the number of tourists was more than two million. However, the big amount of income from the tourists does not go into the national treasury. On the contrary, it remains in the hands of businesspeople of a private company. To give the right to Oknha Sok Kong’s company to manage Angkor Wat is like to allow this company to collect money from the tourists just on its own, while the state loses tens of millions of dollars each year. It is not known why such an easy arithmetic has been agreed upon; the government as well as the Prime Minister has many well-educated advisors – why do they not see an easy way of creating benefits from Angkor Wat; or is the money, which Sok Kong’s company earns, quietly shared with government officials and not put into the national treasury? If a simple farmer would manage Angkor Wat instead of Sok Kong’s company, and the government would each year just wait to get $50 million from the farmer, this would also be possible. But Sok Kong’s company probably provides $40 million of the $50 million earned to government leaders, keeps $10 million for itself, and hands on $10 million for the nation. Doing so can solve problems for this company so that the company maintains the right to continue to manage the temple area, and it can easily collect money from the tourists. It is believed that this is why the government does not stop Sok Kong’s company from managing Angkor Wat.

“Mr. Son Chhay thinks that it is a shame for the Khmer nation to have Angkor Wat, but the state does not have the ability to manage the temple area; instead, it gives the management to a private company to put toll gates on the ways into the Angkor Wat temple area in order to collect money from foreign tourists. Mr. Son Chhay demanded that Prime Minister Mr. Hun Sen reconsiders the contract between the government and the Sokimex company on the management of Angkor Wat soon, because while the number of tourists increases, the company does not spend anything on Angkor Wat, the company just sleeps and waits to easily collect money from the historical heritage of our Khmer ancestors.

“But will the government take Angkor Wat away from being managed by the businessman Sok Kong or not? By retaining Sok Kong’s company to manage Angkor Wat, officials get much money into their own pockets, but the government gets little. When the government has little money, it cannot spend much on various services. At the end, only high ranking officials and businesspeople live comfortably from the heritage of our Khmer ancestors who are the ancestors of all.” Samleng Yuvachun Khmer, Vol.15, #3227, 12.1.2008

Newspapers Appearing on the Newsstand:
Saturday, 12 January 2008

Kampuchea Thmey, Vol.7, #1543, 12.1.2008

  • [Thach Phen] Secretary of State of Information Calls for Journalists’ Associations to Join Together
  • Sam Rainsy [opposition leader] and Nhek Bun Chhay [secretary-general of Funcinpec] Do Not Support Royal Family in Politics
  • Japan Provides Three Modern Machines for Destroying Mines to the Cambodian Mine Action Center
  • 200,000 People Evacuated from Floods in Mozambique
  • More Than 40,000 People Evacuated from Floods in Sri Lanka

Koh Santepheap, Vol.41, #6243, 12-13.1.2008

  • Cambodia Is a Model of an International Tribunal; Japanese Delegation [of Ministry of Foreign Affairs] Satisfied with Peacefully Bringing Former Khmer Rouge Leaders to Court
  • Baribour District Police Inspector [Hem Heang] Extorts Riel 1.55 Million [approx. US$380] from [two] Fishermen Who Fished with Electric Prods [in exchange for releasing them – Kompong Chhnang]

Moneaksekar Khmer, Vol.15, #3362, 12-13.1.2008

  • Sam Rainsy Party Parliamentarians Asks to Stop Plan to Pump Soil to Fill Boeng Kak Lake [Phnom Penh]
  • 1,000 Sam Rainsy Party Youth Will Wear Hats with [the party’s] Candlelight Emblem to Collect Rubbish from Wat Phnom to Chroy Chongva Bridge [Phnom Penh]
  • Na Mardy, Director-General of the Memut Rubber Plantation, Corruptly Takes State Money of Millions of Dollars per Year
  • Corrupt Officials at Poipet Border Crossing Continue to Extort Money from Vendors Freely

Rasmei Kampuchea, Vol.16, #4487, 12.1.2008

  • About 20 Former Senior Funcinpec Officials Will Appear in Cambodian People’s Party Congress Today
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson: Cambodian Government Adheres to Position of One-China Policy
  • Siem Reap Adds Another Deputy Governor [Um Mara from CPP], Making Total Number of Leaders [governor and deputies] Increase to Eleven
  • Three Americans and One Brit Drive [two] Cars [Trabant – made in former East Germany] Across 21 Countries and Arrive in Cambodia

Samleng Yuvachun Khmer, Vol.15, #3227, 12.1.2008

  • Income from Angkor Wat Is More Than $60 Million, but the State Gets Less than $10 Million
  • Power of Senior Teacher Sok An Helps to Hide Corruption of Millions of Dollars of Nhek Kosal Vithyea [Director of Telecom Cambodia] Very Well
  • Test to Allow Youth of Sam Rainsy Party and Youth of Cambodian People’s Party to Collect Rubbish in Streets Together [on Sunday 13 January]

Sralanh Khmer, Vol.3, #598, 12.1.2008

  • 85% of Poor People in Prame Commune, Preah Vihear, Starve; They Eat Manioc Tubers Instead of Rice
  • More Than 100 Smuggled Motorcycles Imported [from Thailand] to Cambodia Every Day through Sampov Lun Border Crossings, Battambang

Go to last week’s editorial

Back to top


Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

4 Responses to “Saturday, 12.1.2008: Income from Angkor Wat Is More Than $60 Million, but the State Gets Less Than $10 Million”

RSS Feed for The Mirror Comments RSS Feed

I have just known that Gov’t gets $1o M from
Sokimex company for privatizing Angkor Wat.

I think the gov’t is clever to have the temple
run by private individuals. At least, it can
get the amount of money for the benefit of the
people. If it is state-run, I
am not sure if the people can benefit from
this $1o M as you all know that we
already finds it hard to know how much the private
company earns from the temple, so how can we
manage to know how much the gov’t earns if it
runs the temple itself. Will the gov’t tell you
how much money it gets from the temple when we
don’t even know how much the PP municipality
earns each year and how it spends that money?

it is very shameful to know such thing. we are better informed citizens and we can express, but for those in the rural represent the majority don’t know this and therefore their rights and voice is counted little. Poor Khmer; nothing we can act upon beside the vote we could give.

[…] company. No one seems to know exactly how much Sokimex earns from Angkor tickets each year, but it may have been $60 million US or more in 2007. Yet, because the Cambodian government – itself no model for fiscal righteousness […]

[…] 6. 更正之前發表的「導遊所說有關吳哥窟門票收入」說法,更正後資料為下:綜合外國媒體報導,1999年柬國政府悄悄將吳哥古蹟的門票收入管理權交給與其關係密切的石油公司Sokimex管理,門票收入由Sokimex收走,每年只要交一百萬美金權利金給柬國政府,後來在國際壓力下,才予以提高(Tales of Asia網根據《金邊郵報》(Phnom Penh Post)報導,權利金改成前300萬美元的收入50%歸政府,超出300萬美元的部分70%歸政府)。至於門票收入有多少投入維護吳哥古蹟,由於資料不透明,各家資料只能靠推估,維基百科說2000年約28%投入重建,但根據媒體The Mirror觀察,2007年吳哥窟的收入估計有五千萬美金,政府只收到一千萬美元。吳哥地區的重建經費大部分由國際政府贊助的單位提供。) […]

Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: